About

A verification service for outsourced bioequivalence evidence.

Intelligent CroW checks study evidence for the party that relies on it. The first service is an integrity screen for generic sponsors that outsource a bioequivalence study. Beside it sits a free verifier, a prototype that is not yet distributed, for anyone who must check a study package without trusting the party that produced it. Status: prototype.

Who is behind it

Founded by a physician and former BA/BE investigator

Intelligent CroW was founded by a physician who worked as a bioavailability and bioequivalence investigator. This site does not publish the founder's name. You will know who you are dealing with before any agreement is signed.

CroW works for the sponsor. It takes no fee from a CRO for any study it screens or verifies for a sponsor.

What exists today

Prototypes, run on synthetic studies only

The screen, the sponsor report, the verification package and the verifier exist as prototypes. They have run from end to end on synthetic studies. No real study has been screened. No copy of the screen, the package or the verifier has left CroW.

The statistics engine is checked against frozen outputs of the reference R packages. All 1,417 checks pass on the current build, and that evidence can be shared with a sponsor under a confidentiality agreement.

CroW does not claim that any of its software meets an electronic records regulation. It states no performance figure for the screen.

Screenprototype, synthetic studies only
Reportprototype
Packageprototype, format confidential
Verifierprototype, not distributed
The company

The legal entity is not yet confirmed

Intelligent CroW is the name of the service. The legal entity that will sign agreements with sponsors is not yet confirmed. Its registered name will appear on this page, and in every agreement, before any engagement begins.

This site names no customer, no partner and no reviewer, because there are none to name yet. CroW will name none without written consent.

Talk to us

Ask us anything about how a report is made.

A first conversation needs no study data.